We discover that we are men when we can look to a face and say “you”. In fact, the newborn looks for the face of the mother, as the child looks for the face of the parents, the lover looks for the face of the beloved, the disciple looks for the face of the teacher, the man looks for the face of God.
Sean Penn, gets the denominations in a twist, on Twitter. Evangelical Charismatic' Catholics, reached about 25% across Catholicism around the turn into-the-80s. How many, Fundie-type, Christians, laugh at Sean?
Yet..., Don't Know (The) History?
Or, assume/come, and go-vague, on the meaning of 'Evangelical'?
Dreamy and dozy, morphing it into an amorphous... 'Christian Denomination'?
Like many, I've an un-'conventional narrative of human history'. I consider some words prophetic. Involving that which goes beyond communication in the normal sphere of things. Somehow unearthing something in the hearer and this, correspondingly affects the 'unseen'. Our response to say, Orwell's 1984 and James Tracy's dismissal through this article/comments – can have, particular power. Not all incidents and/or words, speak to our times in such a way, but the connecting the two here – I believe – does.
What's key, is our response. And this infusing in us encouragement and hope, into necessary actions not see our world going, at least in-all, the obviously unwanted ways. Go all-'1984'. Somehow we're empowered to achieve this. Something-like, hopefully the opposite of a memory hole. What's hidden or oppressed is exposed in coming liberation etc. I appreciate this isn't saying a lot, I'm only highlighting; we can see 1984 as a where-we're going or, maybe or with even more faith, somehow – not. I thought to write. All together now, and all that. Thanks.
Ne'er about my bit, this is an enthralling post on the intellectual light-house – Memory Hole.
And if you’d to like to experience the cat among the birds on this, consider Brendon O'Connell talking with Nick Spero and the word is – Talpiot. Critics claim overstatement. Brendon goes head down and on, burning bridges with all but those who’ll join his chorus. How, not to make many friends but look for specific comrades.
What's a bigger info-communication need, than read, watch and engage across intellectual and religious/or-not divides? The more on Zionism, more we light the wider terrain.
The circle extended, to refute or rally-up. Or, for me, lots of as yet grey not B&W conclusions.
For example, can't say I'm not considerate of Mr. Isolate But Preserve -- Brendon O'Connell -- who's adamant it's all clear-as; Putin and Netanyahu with City Of London want a 'One Belt One Road'.
Regardless, in some aspects, how bi or tri-polar the brokers sift out: The threat of a), Won't -- moving into increasing cannot -- speak of the influence/power of Israel-first.
Leads to b), Bombs (or whatsoever not described by this) down on the masses from Jordan up to, suppose, the northern Caucasus?
And what of the Bear? Are they being offered a deal? Offering, or the offensive -- depending on Atlanticist leverage within? And so who sits at the table's head? At least in managing war plans.
At least, left to/run by, those perhaps, the final backroom elite.
Power needs to destroy social relations, to create lonely, perfectly manipulable individuals. It even legitimized having to hide his face with a mask. However, how do you have a relationship with the other without seeing him in the face? The human face is the part of the body that must always be naked and that must not be hidden. It is no coincidence that in ancient Greece the slave was defined as faceless, therefore without dignity.
It's explained that all relationship require a little give and take. This is untrue. Any partnership demands that we give and give and give and at the last, as we flop into our graves exhausted, we are told that we didn't give enough.
― Quentin Crisp.
QC on how to become a virgin? Something, Jordan Peterson says about the appreciation of art, on Biblical Series I: Introduction to the Idea of God.
Not sure of the quote I'd read. A substitute, and smacker think:
Whatever it is that is you has this capacity to experience reality and to transform it, which is a very strange thing. You can conceptualize the future in your imagination, and then you can work and make that manifest—participate in the process of creation. That’s one way of thinking about it. That’s why I think Genesis 1 relates the idea that human beings are made in the image of the divine—men and women, which is interesting, because feminists are always criticizing Christianity as being inexorably patriarchal. Of course, they criticize everything like that, so it’s hardly a stroke of bloody brilliance. But I think it’s an absolute miracle that right at the beginning of the document it says straightforwardly, with no hesitation whatsoever, that the divine spark which we’re associating with the word, that brings forth Being, is manifest in men and women equally. That’s a very cool thing. You got to think, like I said, do you actually take that seriously? Well, what you got to ask is what happens if you don’t take it seriously, right? Read Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment. That’s the best investigation into that tactic that’s ever been produced.
On floors of music where the milkwhite cloak of childhood lies
O my lady, my fairest dear, my sweetest, loveliest one
Your lips have splashed my dull house with the speech of flowers
My hands are hallowed where they touched over your
It is good to be weary from that brilliant work
It is being God to feel your breathing under me
A waterglass on the bureau fills with morning . . .
Don’t let anyone in to wake us.
Symbolic-becomes, when reappropriated.
WE: add something to actions seeking to advance their dark ways. Destructive people's currency. Rather than a-God gives a sign, they God-think with, take chance and initiative. Set aims and schedule actions. Plot the numerical dots.
What of this interacts with unseen things/beings? Is about 'our' reaction and investment. Symbols are viewer-dependent. The 'spell' isn't it, but us/if. We are their power when we declare lies and deception -- or truth?
77 9/11 777 all this bullshit think power. No, we are hyp-no-'d.