Search 'Truther' on 'news'. Get The Week. 'What are ‘false flags’ and ‘crisis actors’?
First ten; 'Conspiracy theories have long captured the imaginations of people sceptical ...'
Purposeful push, the inconsequential. Size show respect. Fit for breezy dismissal.
'Sane Progressive' has been highlighting it's plausible to deny is illegal. Since 2012 in earnest. When all broke Sandy Hook loose.
Latest suppose-is has Florida county sheriff Scott Israel bring a word. As boss of the failed to respond-ers, asks for 'more powers'. To lock up, the look-like and might, on social media. Force some drugs into and let go under community-based shackles. With indeterminate detention, if need be.
“Different states are talking about being able to involuntarily take a suspect or a subject who might be the victim of mental health illness and bringing them to a facility where they can be evaluated and treated. In Florida we call it the ‘Baker Act’.” Says Mr Israel.
But hey, all fake -- talking fake. Right to be barbed Paul Craig Roberts has it down: 'Almost all, if not all, of the carnage events have more unanswered than answered questions. You should ask yourself why the questions remain unanswered if the official stories are true.'
Logic not brought into mainstream or polite intelligent middle-class discourse. Geeks, freaks and bedroom-stuck teens, playing X-Files with the news. This Week's wee, can't ignore, best steam-off and -- bury. The opening line has revealing merit.
'Long captured the imaginations?' How long might this be? From Rome in charge, even before. Famous as Trojan. How about 53 since the 1930's. Where the Washington Blog documents and adds; 'So Common … There’s a Name for It. The use of the bully’s trick is so common that it was given a name hundreds of years ago.'
But we be: Peep too cynical, claiming vast crowds could cooperate in a cover-up. Too loud and preposterous to conceive probable. This the retort. That our 'captured' minds, are all thrilled up in assumed clever comfort. Need to think- above, resident journos and commentators.
Choice? We believe X, on X paper or in a studio, or... dah... inter-net. Interviews with the ordinary involved in these tragedies. While not able to name one recognisable figure, agreeing we 'live in the age of false-flags.'
Rare jump-ship by Naomi Wolf is telling. At two minutes for muted, dare-applaud, among those uncomfortable and not. A picture of our times.
Reasons why though? And motive. To care to go-public and type like-here. Regardless of readership or none. Talk on YT etc. Increasing and 'etc.' eh.
Because it's make or break for the children. We stand and may overcome, or don't and won't. False-flags are the brazen dangle before, bait and leash. The speak up and shut-down. We care-not or cower from concern -or- pipe up?
Steve Pieczenik interviewed by Owen Shroyer. On most pop. discredited/despised/ex-spooks are still spooks etc. network. Pushed 'get into Florida'. Wants details and conclusions. (Tried find again clip and didn't but assure ya, ain't no Mandela-ing).
On and on, and typical contrary comes Pieczenik, wouldn't go there. Instead kept talking 'same playbook' and naming 'no one died' events from the Sandy Hook starter. Then he said, 'it's so Alex backtracks on claims, no one died...". Bam. To have him, 'say' so.
My take. Any spokesperson threatened by an exodus of outraged supporters, the financial drain. Now YT bans. In Jones' case, mocking mainstream. But how much is it -- 'for' this? As much, or more than, try-get the AK-15's taken. Likely looking, first goal.
Pieczenik talks of distracting 'flags'. While to his credit, continues to reassert, the realistic-looking fakery. Repeats like a chant. Some kind of assertive mantra of defiance. Yet to be overturned, and naming these events is where the heat's at.
The Hannibal L. story-line and the later killings to cover the first one and where vulnerable. This comes to mind. Getting prominent Truthers to not stay-open to fake and f.f. but get definite and casualties on ones, with little/no evidence. And how the need for detractors. We need those claiming the numbers and scope of co-opted perpetrators too wide to manage -- to come into debate. Or, they will increase, if not addressed. Somehow with respect. Unlikely, shown in return.
False-flags/fakes are not 'imagination capturing' interests. Not here/me. They're the one lotta of corruption, having most social damage. From a materialist perspective, agree, they're not the ish. Go psychological? How can we assess the consequences? Get unseen-entity about -- in my prophetic reading -- the idols apocalypse in our midst. Representative in under the surface warfare, weapons and acts of bad-faith. We need deliverance from these hellish spirits.
Without these lies broken... We need to hear media talk about and so the masses follow: