Commented on Crimes of Empire The Orlando Nightclub “Attack”
Last night I retweeted ‘Dominos’ to ‘Is Orlando becoming the new Chicago?’ Be honest, I never really paid attention to the incident. Isn’t this telling, carried on. How many die a day – and where? Numbed by numbers. Earlier, I’d retweeted a photo of a girl that stated, ‘Muslims are NOT terrorists’ – ‘Why would they be? But yes, needs reiterating’. And another, ‘Major Muslim Terrorist To Americans, “WE ARE COMING AFTER YOU” – ‘Major..? Yes there’s Islam-based terror but who holds the flags? Who is pulls the…’
And now you shake-up my lack of attention. As though I don’t want to look. Will and do, obviously. But/and so do I weep (would that I would) for what? Been sharing my concerns, details over some stories, decreasingly matter among overturn-lies-journalism. In regard to incidents in US and Europe of ‘terror’-ism. At the very least, profiles of alleged killer manipulated to manufacture through to..?
Here you come: Refusing to err on the side of broad-strokes, “we know they do false-flags, what’s it matter how far this one might be… lots going on, move-on…” Outcome: If it’s Islamic? That’ll do.
Not here James. Thank God.
My consternation is this. I recently listened to Bill Warner interview. Intend to listen again. Previously heard him and others – many there are. I take in, for me a balance; History, Koran-says, general research over communities attitudes, along with – personal communication with Muslims. Particularly ones met, again and again, who say; “the ones with bombs and guns etc, outside a war-zone? Are NOT Muslims”. Not bad ones, or those from an ‘extreme’ perspective – Not-Muslims. At all. I believe them. And the ones at ‘war’? Jacked-up on stimulants, grabbing the Koran because tribe-do, peer-pressured/threatened, into psyched-up hate. Not…
‘Islam/Muslim’, if not defined or discerningly expressed, can be dumb-blunt discrimination. At least add ‘-icist’, then we understand. Like some people’s use of the word ‘gay’ (oh, not supposed to use that – it’s ‘homosexual’). More alienation talk, without necessity. There are vast numbers gay and/or into Allah, those exposing the psyops and central-command sickos, would do well to encourage their viewing, let alone participation. Is what’s said, always considering this? Encouraging? Not necessarily, if I was a Crime of Empire busting companion in the fight and ‘one of them’.
Sure, don’t pussy about and hide facts about crimes/nationality/religious beliefs. Discuss the subject deep and true-seeking but the divide and – trying to be – conquerors, are in full-swing. The enemy makes us..? This the most worst way they have.
One solution: talk (more) to Muslims.
Yes, yes, yes, Gay-mafia, yes, yes, hostile people with dreadful aspects of culture immigrating in. Truly dreadful. And a scandal to override public reluctance to open-borders. But, a football match can cause ideological violence, Donald talking to his fans etc. etc. And ask numbers of peoples and c/o cultures or what other drivers; attitudes to women, gay-people – what have you? Shocking discrimination. So dear man, your post stirs me thus. I almost don’t want you to boldly go… but must… lies are lies. Investigation is honesty in action. Today, looking at a bit in my Good Book, hadn’t so noticed; ‘when he lies, he speaks in his native language, for he is a liar…’. Haven’t done a study on it but ‘language’ / ‘native’ ?
Mean to speak right but once something gets adopted, we might want to check it’s communicating what we mean.
Not often enough here on ‘Crimes’ but never superfluous or duplicating. Stand in that gap.