Waiting for someone to write a sensible article about Isaac. Give me something to scoop about. Uptake's been low all round and i.e. YT vids, relative to the size of the claims made by a public figure about other names. The catch-22 and asking for legal recourse, make it difficult to ignore. The fluid, free and authentic-sounding presentations, adds to it convincing. There's a timeline-based telling of the Seth story, which reads detailed and open.
Presume the push to can't ignore but must address will come? Seth Green and for-sure, saying he feels sorry for a deluded, lying, ex-friend. Others and famous, if confronted, could with a relaxed pose, laugh it off. Say the evidence-empty accusations are too 'beneath them' to care about.
Why would Seth ask his mate to abuse without even warming him up to this? Knowing a taker? In the latest of Isaac's broadcasts, he's asked about 'coke' and says he 'hates it'. Anyway, nowhere does he state drugs were a factor. Which could be, and often is, the driver of deviant crimes?
A recent claiming-Seth comment -- Issac brushes off. Unless he's waiting to know for sure it's not a wind-up and not-Seth, he will and should respond.
Is this Seth? If so, must be, someone's lying:
Hi. This is Seth Green. I'm just going to get straight to the point. Me and my wife are into ageplay. We have toys, diapers, milk bottles, children's books, handcuffs and other weird things simply for the kink factor. We have experimental phases and use our hidden room and the upper room of our house as play rooms for our fetishes.
I never told Isaac we were into children. I told him about how we liked to age play as children. There's a huge difference!
I feel a bit embarrassed having to admit that on a public forum as it's only something a few of our close friends know about but there you go!
I have no hard feelings for Isaac but he really went overboard with these accusations when he could have just asked me man-to-man to clarify. I'm not a threatening person. He knows this! Now you have all these websites and blogs and chan boards accusing me & my wife and many of our friends of being pedos or pedo-enablers all because of his misinterpretation of things that happened last year.(shakes head)
I have no clue about the Illuminati comment on the EW article. It really sounds like a spam comment. I'm not sure who the couple with the child was at Paris Jackson's party who asked for me. I wasn't there. I have no idea about the strange men who 're apparently following you around as you claim. It all really sounds like your own paranoia.
Me and Clare distanced ourselves from him after he slipped her a note telling her not to fuck with him and other weird things which read like a drunken rant. He continued to text her after that repeatedly wanting to meet up, as if he had no recollection of the note. It was all very weird so we ended up cutting him off and many of our friends/family did the same. Clare and I never did anything for him to act like such an asshole for no reason. We were only ever kind and generous. It's sad when you lose a friend because their mind has spiraled into delusions.
If you have any questions feel free to ask..
'In the mouth of two or three witnesses...' is where action could occur? Corroborating testimonies from even a circumstantial viewpoint would make demands.
The difficulty of this could-be-Seth line is about appearances. Not clear-as and why 'play rooms for [our] fetishes' with children's stuff isn't a problem? Of course, it's one-step from paedophilia. Whatever and "we wouldn't" the case. Why would you dare say this to someone, who with any kind of knowledge about, not assume might take it the wrong way?
The converse quandary can only be explained that the brazen invite to abuse, is because it is... everywhere. In these circles and for decades and deep. Ever tested, the lid never gets lifted.
So what to write?
Too many independent insiders or with first-hand knowledge attest to the epidemic. Why wouldn't this bait and blackmail run the influential and elite? The hands-behind puppets in a cynical plot. Disregard they're materialists through and through. Too much talk of rituals and other-world-like powers.
Jerry Sandusky was innocent -- almost certain. Get that obvious one out. Although ignored and rehashed by people preferring "being right" vs. truth and repentance. No mental gymnastics to see what's lacking and this one's trial.
One clear and present, are liars talking-truthers. Yet, the obvious pull-back from covering is an oversensitivity to uncertainty. All the while, the marching and stomping boot on the face of free expression is coming from all corners.
Not the time to be reputation protective and want more confidence before output. All sounds too fantastic to have Isaac yapping about? Best talk a lot about what we can't be so sure. On all sorts of scores.
The biggest changer would be a new 'falsey' relating to the internet connection. Being the instrument, emergency laws go up and on. And overnight and OFF we all are. That's all it takes. Protection from the baddies who hacked this latest said/or real destruction.
What motive would Issac have to take 'ageplay' and make it about an invite to abuse? Why would Seth be so foolish to invite into abuse etc. etc.
Not massive into writing this part 2 post. Said 'might' and sort of feel half-compelled.
The fact so little gets written about. In some ways. What does this say?