Update re below: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fa-4UO0PzBY
(Due to self-imposed and severe internet restrictions, will attempt to lay-off posting. Better and much, much, less. Manage the fasting tip-top-right, might post more. If...).
The first thing to note and Dispossession of land on the basis of race – a State Enrichment and Control Strategy in the South African Context is the numbers.
Little over 3000 views and 50 comments. Excluding re-posts, an urgent news-hitting Saker piece gets 20,000. Hardly awaken revival hour but something showing life and health.
What does 3000 say about this epic, detailed and revealing piece about South Africa? And what can we surmise and the numbers/period?
'Truth is a lonely warrior' says Perloff. This accepted shocker. The crashing wave and waning interest. The inevitable find and seek alternative and incisive-commentary crowds -- done gone. Seekers to know, get the true state of the mess, so then what..?
Know that levelling off. What keeps me on is output. Somehow, doing something... well, adds purpose to read the relevant. While comments on sites, tell you most everything, and active quality. With respect, in getting there are only very few places to go and the diminishing taker issue.
Plus vids have become the new wave. (For me a hatch to baton down and not touch. Unless on physical health and exercise. Y'do get... these posts are notes to m'self eh?)
Second: This article is well written. Sure gets slammed, some say, for not doing 'white on black' oppression justice. But who can criticise the concise and readable presentation? Where might we find better coverage?
(If I allowed myself on the web/aka the new regime. Would look to compare, see what the others communicate? Bet this hot-as, yet underseen).
What I got was compassion. The word is 'sadness' but trying to find hope.
So what about the pain and war? For me, opens up and reveals the scope and depth of a wind-up. Addressing racism -- for the most part -- causing more friction and fighting than it solves. Think about the UK and what a Right-Left dopey ding-dong. Two most dislikable's. Played by the press. Proper puppets.
Again: How the anti-immigration/racism lot are full of liars. One tool to prod them along is claimed terrorism. All hiding from evidence and run by state-complicit actors. And will either side talk about this? Nope. Will either side talk whatever... no, not too widely. Certain debates but not X Y Z, in case...
They ponce about with ideological entitlement. Mouthy and hostile to the detriment of their cause and character.
They're played by the mainstream publicity and waddle along. Get split and schism-ed up by the establishment politicos and spooks. Must be worth something to keep their two-party fake opposition. Keep subversive infiltrators out from their party midst. Using Brexit and Jewish talk as a punch-bag.
Wants all on; one or other, starting point. Ethno-state believers and all about 'whites' downtrodden for extinction, while suffering double standards. Or let's get black and real. Gender, sexuality and race are all that we are.
There are some cracking challenges in the comments on Anon's piece and his/her own thoughts. Won't bring out, for all this here is to get over: Read-read-read it/them.
Seems to me 'anon' is trying to bridge and avoid the box?
Colour riots... what got me shaking is the volatility and tinderbox. Will spend some time, and take more re-reading.
This'll do. Not paid by the word. Not here to try impress. OK... a bit, but not too much.
What did Bukowski put as his epitaph? 'Don't Try'.
Final blab: THE only matter to me is the lack of intellectual courage. Last night did a rare and shouldn't put a comment on a Christian leader's new vid. One line compliment and how we'd spent time together yonks ago. One question: But how open are you? (He was talking of coming crisis times). And said; 'but how long will this comment stand?' Will not be returning to see.
Dare call for openness? And this sin, aka not the best? Find that verse bucko.
But this is all that most gets me. How shut-down scared so many are. Proud pussies who will not engage. Or disagree with grace and freedom. If there's something we won't discuss, it's likely got power we'd rather not deal with.
Cannot take a challenge. Hiding from facing. Not up to be re-educated or informed, outside of set agendas. Etc. etc. etc.
Truthscoop is a lot about my signposting. Here to Anon. Who even comments. The tone is right. All about this. Proceeds position.
Open to asking is the only answer. Anything less is a sign someone's shaky. Usually covered with over-done assertiveness. The only insecure move remaining.
Where are the women and men into seeking truth over comforting themselves? Their absence is enough to put you off the web. Keep us coddled and childish.