After this, going on Plant a Seed to write about and from, 'unless God'. Verses that include; '...watchers in vain'. Scanning with a heavy heart, for me, a barren internet. Thousands of hours to listen/watch and not up-for but hardly much to read. Actually, comments can provide some respite and in this -- hope.
The 'vain' bit is any assuming tones, that alt. news makes any alt. difference, in bringing about an alternative and better world? That listening or reading -- does very much? The most popular outfits and those more on a mission-footing, often carry the chime that exposure and protest counts. We the watchers, they therefore should... watch out.
Another Bible line is about looking in a mirror and forgetting what we've seen. And not doing, over and above looking, a deception. One of my rants on repeat is the need to publicly express something ourselves, or should know our political/social challenge is... in vain.
Sure, if interesting fascination is what we're after, off ye go... But if we equate action to bystanding, we've yet to wake-up.
Perhaps a clear proviso is some kind of practical home or community prepping. This hunker-down and buttress the storm activity is fair do's. Yet, to believe we're not 'watching in vain' and adding to the voices of protest? This takes, standing digitally up. Or how is this for radical, or on printed matter?
Becoming a follower and beyond private-believer matters, the rest is a prelude to any maturity.
This blog is irrelevant, except if ever someone found encouragement to do their own. One person. Do the maths, as they say.
Stopped writing to people who I mention first-time, even those who're examples for me, and co-belligerents. The open letter approach and try influencing, doesn't make sense.
Write as though a reader might be unfamiliar with conspiracy and that which is hidden in plain view. I write to help me cope and not crack-up so, to stimulate and towards God. I write because Crimes and BBB encouraged me -- and me, them.
Paul Craig Roberts and The Saker are established and unusually provoking reads.
Paul's latest prophetic cry is almost too alarming for comment. The shock of those unable to debate but punch -- and justify -- someone who believes, there are only two and these fixed, genders.
And at all places, Speakers Corner. The reason is simple, it's virtually 'one of their own' in the queer etc. camp and this, always most bitter and threatening, to those unable to face the music.
Something isn't always most-hated and censored a show of validity but if it cannot be contained in a reasonable discussion. Says what?
One mostly and obviously so: The conspiracy that intends to obliterate all distinctions, in set-up of fights along the way, to the mega-city lock-down. Is itself, an example.
Progressive evangelicals who I'm loosely akin with, NEVER discuss this proposal, while pretending it's an over-wrought reaction and geeky dot-speculating, paranoid, giddy-led, panic station thinking.
Set to review a collection of essays on Open Theism, which in the widest theology-considering terms, is said to be an unwanted heretical conspiracy theory. Again -- avoidance is the response, by much of the field speculating about Jesus. Well in decline are the overly-defensive/don't do discussion lot but there can be no reversal of this movement, truth is like water it tends to seep through and in the gaps.
Therefore, Open Theism is a no, no, no. As is, conspiratorial analysis... similarly it's, run-run-away from.
And to The Saker. Want to weep at his 'Moderation Policy (UPDATED Sept. 26th, 2017)'. Sure his band, his songs, his gig and the right to refuse admission. But does he really think he shows anything but vulnerability in one of his rules and a suggestion? Does he really think this, of or for, God -- even if his position is or was, somehow God's?
What a conspicuous display, these absolute two clangers and banners of insecurity.
6) New! Any comment stating or implying that homosexuality is a “normal and natural variation of human sexuality” goes to trash; this blog has decided to emulate the city of Moscow and has therefore banned any types of (virtual) “gay-pride” (aka homosexual dysfunction) “parades” in the comments section, also for the next 100 years. Simply put: take your propaganda of homosexuality elsewhere :-P
Sure he wouldn't bash someone physically but it's still horrendous 'thou doth protest too...' Not that I care to, or want to, read a debate or challenge his view but to 'emulate banning'?
Again, any need to comment on? The only redeemable aspect is it shows his honesty and would never lack integrity to moderate-off without up-front why. Get his other 'banning' categories but there's a call for respect and then, there's fear.
He can freely believe and on Criticism of Religion; Also, here is a rule of thumb: avoid quoting authors, (even if they fancy themselves as “theologians”) who were born after 1900 -- but again, how telling and what magical thinking?
So yes and honest prejudice but truth is, comes across all head-sand-in stuck and blinkers-on. Position is weak and a kind of nostalgic idolatry.
So this post is saying?
Resistance to consider and engage, while maintaining consistent with some hallowed truth... not in the Bible. Paul calls it, blind boxing. Putting a certain set of doctrinal interpretations -- here from the 'Orthodox' trad. and denomination/s -- in a special-pleading category. Protected goods. That anyone can rightly hold, but it's the lack of balls to go to Speakers Corner and be prepared to give reason for. Which this very last place to yap openly and publicly in the UK has persistently descended into and lost all its once held power into: Shout-about and hide from honest debate.