Try laughing at this. Or do. Deeply profound. Let it move me.
Better talk than a zillion dull preachers chattering without urgency or insight. Previously mentioned this stream of honourable and sincere. This morning’s breakfast. Fast from the silence. On to the blessed – yet more-often damned-riddled – internet. First five minutes of this, . . .
Hold the front-page. Haven’t got time to gabba. Haven’t gone on to find – react to – something. Paul Craig writes so well. What’s his latest?
Frankly, bored with the misadventures of Donald. Yet, chose this piece from Paul (three-back) and not his Slavery/Civil War lesson.
Don’t want to overly overstate the last word in the excerpt below but . . .
"...is that somewhat accurate?"
"It's completely wrong."
Pieczenik punching. When he's on it, he's on it. Sometimes don't watch/listen to him but when THIS happens, more-mad-warring, he's an intellectual flame-thrower. Might be the only voice reaching the many millions and echelons c/o AJ. Although . . .
Came on this crowd soon after they got together. Previously dipped in and out of George and immediately celebrated what seemed an inclusive approach when Trish and Jason made a team. All with a theoretical mandate for those regularly commenting.
A collaborative exercise that's vulnerable to cavalier connections, not necessarily . . .
Realised I read ‘A Russian Diary’ by Anna P. – what, must’ve been in ‘07. Soon after, with bank runs and searching about financial manipulation, awoke to the clearer and deeper scam. The who, doing what, and why. About everywhere, with stretching tentacles.
Russia – more specifically, Putin and cabal – a little more independent than not, . . .
Said I’d write about, of all things, Obamacare. This to someone who I’m not expecting will read this but argued, against this US-living family/couple’s position, claimed pros not cons for the scheme. Sent them the first link I could find slamming it.
Writing as an exercise. Try to be able to say something, about whatever. Here goes.
And . . .